Search for: All records

Powerful digital grasping is essential for primates navigating arboreal environments and is often regarded as a defining characteristic of the order. However,in vivodata on primate grip strength are limited. In this study, we collected grasping data from the hands and feet of eleven strepsirrhine species to assess how ecomorphological variables—such as autopodial shape, laterality, body mass and locomotor mode—influence grasping performance. Additionally, we derived anatomical estimates of grip force from cadaveric material to determine whetherin vivoandex vivogrip strength measurements follow similar scaling relationships and how they correlate. Results show that bothin vivoand anatomical grip strength scale positively with body mass, though anatomical measures may overestimatein vivoperformance. Species with wider autopodia tend to exhibit higher grip forces, and forelimb grip forces exceed those of the hindlimbs. No lateralization in grip strength was observed. While strepsirrhine grip forces relative to their body weight are comparable to those of other primates and slightly exceed those of humans, they are not exceptional compared to other arboreal mammals or birds, suggesting that claims of extraordinary primate grasping abilities require further investigation. 

Abstract In 1974, Sue Herring described the relationship between two important performance variables in the feeding system, bite force and gape. These variables are inversely related, such that, without specific muscular adaptations, most animals cannot produce high bite forces at large gapes for a given sized muscle. Despite the importance of these variables for feeding biomechanics and functional ecology, the paucity of in vivo bite force data in primates has led to bite forces largely being estimated through ex vivo methods. Here, we quantify and compare in vivo bite forces and gapes with output from simulated musculoskeletal models in two craniofacially distinct strepsirrhines:Eulemur, which has a shorter jaw and slower chewing cycle durations relative to jaw length and body mass compared toVarecia. Bite forces were collected across a range of linear gapes from 16 adult lemurs (suborder Strepsirrhini) at the Duke Lemur Center in Durham, North Carolina representing three species:Eulemur flavifrons(n = 6; 3F, 3M),Varecia variegata(n = 5; 3F, 2M), andVarecia rubra(n = 5; 5F). Maximum linear and angular gapes were significantly higher forVareciacompared toEulemur(p = .01) but there were no significant differences in recorded maximum in vivo bite forces (p = .88). Simulated muscle models using architectural data for these taxa suggest this approach is an accurate method of estimating bite force‐gape tradeoffs in addition to variables such as fiber length, fiber operating range, and gapes associated with maximum force. Our in vivo and modeling data suggestVareciahas reduced bite force capacities in favor of absolutely wider gapes compared toEulemurin relation to their longer jaws. Importantly, our comparisons validate the simulated muscle approach for estimating bite force as a function of gape in extant and fossil primates.